Examining the new legal relationship between the UK and EU
In this post, Jack Williams of Monckton Chambers explains “relevant separation agreement law”, as introduced into domestic law at the end of the transition period by the EU (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020 (the “2020 Act”).
Continue reading “Relevant separation agreement law: a guide for the perplexed”
In this post, Jack Williams of Monckton Chambers explains “retained EU law”, as introduced into domestic law at the end of the transition period by the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (the “2018 Act”).
Continue reading “Retained EU law: a guide for the perplexed”
This post, written by Jack Williams of Monckton Chambers, analyses the rules concerning challenges to the validity of Retained EU Law, as set out in Schedule 1 of the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018 and the Challenges to Validity of EU Instruments (EU Exit) Regulations (SI 2019/673) (as recently amended by the Challenges to Validity of EU Instruments (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020 (SI 2020/1503).
Continue reading “Challenges to the validity of retained EU law”
The end of the Brexit transition period is rapidly approaching. Monckton Chambers is collaborating with the University of Cambridge to deliver a five-part webinar series on EU Relations Law across October – December, exploring all aspects of the new legal relationship between the UK and EU.
Panels are formed of leading experts from academia, Monckton Chambers and the Judiciary. Please see below details and individual registration links for each one-hour webinar, hosted on Zoom. Spaces are limited and registration is required for access.
Continue reading “Monckton – Cambridge Faculty of Law Webinar Series on EU Relations Law”
In this post, Jack Williams of Monckton Chambers explores the Government’s attempts via Clause 45 of the Internal Market Bill to exclude judicial review of Ministerial Regulations made under the Bill in relation to exit procedures and the state aid provisions in Article 10 of the Northern Ireland Protocol.
Continue reading “Clause 45 of Internal Market Bill: a striking attempt to exclude judicial review”