The CAT goes astray on accrued EU law rights

In this post, Jack Williams of Monckton Chambers discusses aspects of the Competition Appeal Tribunal’s (“CAT”) decision in Umbrella Interchange Fee Claimants and Merricks v Umbrella Interchange Fee Defendants and Mastercard [2023] CAT 49 (“Interchange”) concerning whether the CAT was bound to follow the European Court of Justice’s (“CJEU”) decision in C-267/20 Volvo AB and DAF Trucks NV v RM EU:C:2022:494 (“Volvo”), which post-dated IP completion day.

Continue reading “The CAT goes astray on accrued EU law rights”

Preliminary references during the transition period: business as usual?

In this post, Alexandra Littlewood of Monckton Chambers explores the basis for UK courts’ power to make preliminary references during the transition period, the CJEU’s jurisdiction to answer those references, and the extent to which references handed down after the transition period will be binding on UK courts.

Continue reading “Preliminary references during the transition period: business as usual?”

Article 50 reloaded? Amending the Withdrawal Agreement to extend the Brexit transition period

This blog post, written by Alfred Artley of Monckton Chambers, explores whether there is a viable legal basis in the EU treaties which would allow the EU and UK to extend the transition period outside the already-agreed mechanisms in the Withdrawal Agreement.

Continue reading “Article 50 reloaded? Amending the Withdrawal Agreement to extend the Brexit transition period”