Examining the new legal relationship between the UK and EU
This is the third in a series of blogposts on CJEU decisions concerning the UK-EU Withdrawal Agreement by Luke Kelly and Charlotte McLean of Monckton Chambers. In this post, they provide an overview of certain of the Court’s decisions on the topic of judicial cooperation.
Continue reading “CJEU cases about the Withdrawal Agreement – Part 3 on judicial cooperation”
In this post, Jack Williams of Monckton Chambers discusses aspects of the Competition Appeal Tribunal’s (“CAT”) decision in Umbrella Interchange Fee Claimants and Merricks v Umbrella Interchange Fee Defendants and Mastercard [2023] CAT 49 (“Interchange”) concerning whether the CAT was bound to follow the European Court of Justice’s (“CJEU”) decision in C-267/20 Volvo AB and DAF Trucks NV v RM EU:C:2022:494 (“Volvo”), which post-dated IP completion day.
Continue reading “The CAT goes astray on accrued EU law rights”
In this post, Jack Williams of Monckton Chambers explains accrued EU law rights that remain enforceable in domestic courts after the transition period.
Continue reading “Accrued EU law rights: a guide for the perplexed”
This post, written by Jack Williams of Monckton Chambers, examines the availability and status of claims for Francovich damages during and after the transition period.
Continue reading “Francovich claims are dead! Long live Francovich claims?”
In this post, Alexandra Littlewood of Monckton Chambers explores the basis for UK courts’ power to make preliminary references during the transition period, the CJEU’s jurisdiction to answer those references, and the extent to which references handed down after the transition period will be binding on UK courts.
Continue reading “Preliminary references during the transition period: business as usual?”