In this post, Jack Williams of Monckton Chambers explains “retained EU law”, as introduced into domestic law at the end of the transition period by the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (the “2018 Act”).
Continue reading “Retained EU law: a guide for the perplexed”Challenges to the validity of retained EU law
This post, written by Jack Williams of Monckton Chambers, analyses the rules concerning challenges to the validity of Retained EU Law, as set out in Schedule 1 of the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018 and the Challenges to Validity of EU Instruments (EU Exit) Regulations (SI 2019/673) (as recently amended by the Challenges to Validity of EU Instruments (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020 (SI 2020/1503).
Continue reading “Challenges to the validity of retained EU law”Coordination of social security under the Withdrawal Agreement
In this post, Professor Tamara Hervey, Natalia Miernik and James Murphy (each of the University of Sheffield) examine the social security provisions of the Withdrawal Agreement between the UK and the EU.
Continue reading “Coordination of social security under the Withdrawal Agreement”Can the European Commission Secure UK Compliance with the Northern Ireland Protocol? (And why we should be worried if it can)
In this blog post, Professor Kenneth Armstrong of the University of Cambridge explores what options the European Commission has to secure compliance with the Northern Ireland Protocol in light of the UK Government’s Internal Market Bill.
Continue reading “Can the European Commission Secure UK Compliance with the Northern Ireland Protocol? (And why we should be worried if it can)”Clause 45 of Internal Market Bill: a striking attempt to exclude judicial review
In this post, Jack Williams of Monckton Chambers explores the Government’s attempts via Clause 45 of the Internal Market Bill to exclude judicial review of Ministerial Regulations made under the Bill in relation to exit procedures and the state aid provisions in Article 10 of the Northern Ireland Protocol.
Continue reading “Clause 45 of Internal Market Bill: a striking attempt to exclude judicial review”