This is the second in a series of blogposts on CJEU decisions concerning the UK-EU Withdrawal Agreement by Luke Kelly and Charlotte McLean of Monckton Chambers. In this post, they provide an overview of certain of the Court’s decisions concerning IP rights.
Continue reading “CJEU cases about the Withdrawal Agreement – Part 2 on Intellectual property cases”Making an impact: the REULA in action
In this blog post, Jack Williams of Monckton Chambers comments on a recent Court of Appeal case, Makeality Ltd v City Doggo Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 400, which demonstrates the impact of the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023.
Continue reading “Making an impact: the REULA in action”EU law leaves a mark
This post by Clíodhna Kelleher of Monckton Chambers discusses the Supreme Court’s judgment in Skykick v Sky Ltd [2024] UKSC 36, a mammoth trade mark dispute with an interesting EU law dimension.
Continue reading “EU law leaves a mark”A bitter taste? When will the Court depart from assimilated EU case law?
In this blog post Jack Williams of Monckton Chambers discusses a new Court of Appeal judgment, Thatchers Cider Co Ltd v Aldi Stores Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 5 (“Thatchers”), in which the Court decided not to depart from assimilated case law.
Continue reading “A bitter taste? When will the Court depart from assimilated EU case law?”The interpretative role of EU law from 2024
In this blog post, Jack Williams of Monckton Chambers discusses the recent case of E-Accounting Solutions Ltd (t/a Advancetrack) v Global Infosys Ltd (t/a GI Outsourcing) [2023] EWHC 2038 (Ch) (“E-Accounting”) in which HHJ Tindal makes a number of observations about the future impact of the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 (“REUL Act”) and the interpretative role of EU law even after 2023.
Continue reading “The interpretative role of EU law from 2024”