In this blog post, Jack Williams of Monckton Chambers discusses the recent case of E-Accounting Solutions Ltd (t/a Advancetrack) v Global Infosys Ltd (t/a GI Outsourcing) [2023] EWHC 2038 (Ch) (“E-Accounting”) in which HHJ Tindal makes a number of observations about the future impact of the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 (“REUL Act”) and the interpretative role of EU law even after 2023.
Continue reading “The interpretative role of EU law from 2024”The EEA EFTA Separation Agreement and citizens’ rights
In this post Clíodhna Kelleher of Monckton Chambers discusses the EEA EFTA Separation Agreement, freedom of movement law in the EEA, and how the citizens’ rights provisions in the EEA EFTA Separation Agreement conform to and diverge from the equivalent provisions of the UK-EU Withdrawal Agreement.
Continue reading “The EEA EFTA Separation Agreement and citizens’ rights”When do directives form part of Retained EU Law? Case comment
In this post, Jack Williams of Monckton Chambers discusses the recent case of Harris v Environment Agency [2022] EWHC 2264 (Admin) concerning when directives form part of Retained EU Law pursuant to section 4(2)(b) of the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018.
Continue reading “When do directives form part of Retained EU Law? Case comment”Invention is the mother of “necessity”: the Northern Ireland Protocol Bill
In this post, George Peretz Q.C. of Monckton Chambers discusses the Northern Ireland Protocol Bill. The Ireland/Northern Ireland Protocol was at the heart of the Withdrawal Agreement negotiated with the EU in 2019 and was, as required by that agreement, incorporated into UK law. It has important tax implications, especially in the areas of VAT,
customs duties and state aid. The Northern Ireland Protocol Bill would remove most of the Protocol from UK law, despite the UK’s treaty obligation. The government claims that the principle of ‘necessity’ gives a legal basis for that action in international law, but its argument is unconvincing. The Bill is likely to run into considerable opposition in Parliament, especially in the House of Lords. And if passed it would threaten a trade war with the EU with major implications.
Cross Border Injunctions after Brexit
In this post, Steven Gee Q.C. of Monckton Chambers considers cross border injunctions after Brexit and the case of Broad Idea International Ltd v Convoy Collateral Limited [2022] 1 AER 289 (Privy Council).
Continue reading “Cross Border Injunctions after Brexit”